Skip to content
Americans for Propriety
Menu

Letter template · US Representative

To a US Representative: push for VA staffing and PACT Act implementation funding

PACT Act delivered. Implementation requires sustained appropriations to clear backlogs and maintain healthcare capacity.

Updated March 10, 2025 · Issue: veterans and service members

If you’re a veteran, family member, or VA employee, your perspective has particular weight. If you have a specific PACT Act claim experience — successful or stalled — naming it makes the policy concrete. If you live near a VA facility under capacity pressure, naming it is similarly useful.


Dear Representative [Last Name],

I’m writing as a constituent in [district] to ask you to support sustained VA staffing and appropriations levels that match PACT Act implementation needs.

The 2022 PACT Act expanded VA toxic-exposure benefits to hundreds of thousands of veterans. Two years into implementation, the substantive framework has functioned as designed — over a million additional benefit claims have been filed, with hundreds of thousands of veterans approved for service-connected disability ratings related to toxic exposure. The expansion has been one of the most successful veterans-policy enactments in recent memory.

The operational pressure points require sustained appropriations to address:

  1. VA Benefits Administration claims-processing capacity. The volume of new claims has stretched processing capacity. Sustained staffing investment is required to clear backlogs and prevent regrowth.

  2. VA Health Administration staffing. New veterans entering VA care under PACT Act eligibility expansion have stretched healthcare delivery capacity, particularly in regions with high deployment-veteran populations. Wait-time pressure is a measurable concern.

  3. Continued exposure-link expansion. PACT Act required the VA to study additional potential exposure-condition links. The pace of additional presumptions being added has been slower than advocates expected; sustained funding for the research and rulemaking process is necessary.

  4. VA infrastructure investment. Many VA facilities are decades old and operating beyond planned lifespans. Capital investment has been chronically underfunded.

  5. Camp Lejeune litigation administrative support. The Justice Act’s authorization of legal claims has produced one of the largest mass tort actions in US history; federal-court infrastructure handling the claims needs continued support.

[Personalize: name a specific concern. Examples: “I’m a [post-9/11 veteran / Vietnam-era veteran / military family member] with a PACT Act claim that [status]”; “I work at the [specific VA facility] and have seen [staffing/capacity pattern]”; “Our [region] has a high concentration of veterans who depend on [specific VA service]”; “My family member is a [specific exposure category] veteran whose claim is [status]”.]

Annual VA appropriations determine staffing levels at both VBA (claims processing, appeals) and VHA (clinical care). Recent years have included substantial increases; sustained funding is required to avoid backsliding. House Veterans Affairs Committee and Military Construction-VA Appropriations subcommittee members carry particular weight on these decisions.

I’d appreciate knowing your position on VA appropriations levels and on specific provisions in upcoming MilCon-VA appropriations cycles.

Thank you for your service.

Sincerely,

[Your name] [Your address]

← All letters