Skip to content
Americans for Propriety
Menu

Letter template · State Legislator

To a state legislator: support zoning reform / multifamily legalization

State zoning preemption is the most consequential housing-policy development in a generation. Active reform campaigns are underway in many states.

Updated May 22, 2025 · Issue: housing

Personalize. If you’re a renter, an aspiring homebuyer locked out of your local market, or someone who has watched neighbors leave because of housing costs, name that. Specific local examples — a project blocked by current zoning, a price differential supply expansion would address — make this letter substantially more effective.


Dear [Senator/Representative] [Last Name],

I’m writing as a resident of [city/town] to ask you to support [specific zoning reform bill, if known; otherwise: “state-level zoning reform legislation”] in [state name].

The empirical case for state-level zoning preemption is now well-established. Oregon, California, Washington, Massachusetts, Montana, Vermont, and a growing list of states have enacted laws that override exclusionary local zoning to allow duplexes, fourplexes, and small multifamily construction in residential areas. The early evidence is encouraging: permit data is up where reforms have taken effect; multifamily projects are advancing in jurisdictions where they would have been illegal three years ago; political durability has held.

The substantive case for [state] joining this list:

  1. Housing supply. Our state has [specific housing-shortage data if available, or general statement: “a documented housing shortage that has driven rents and home prices well above what local incomes support”]. Restrictive local zoning is the binding constraint on supply expansion.

  2. Concrete reforms. Allowing duplexes and small-multi-unit projects on lots currently zoned single-family-only is the threshold reform. Allowing fourplexes and sixplexes near transit, eliminating parking minimums that block low-cost construction, and streamlining approval timelines for code-compliant projects are the next layer.

  3. Bipartisan precedent. Zoning reform has succeeded in red, blue, and purple states. The political coalition supporting it crosses conventional left-right lines — libertarians, environmentalists, labor unions, faith communities, and pro-housing advocates have all engaged constructively.

  4. Tenant-protection coupling. The most effective state-level packages combine supply expansion with tenant protections (just-cause eviction, source-of-income protections). I’d encourage you to support both sides of the equation.

[Personalize: name a specific local concern. Examples: “I’m a renter in [town] watching costs rise faster than wages”; “Young families in our community can’t afford to buy where they grew up”; “Our school district is losing enrollment because [specific housing pattern]”; “I’m a teacher/nurse/firefighter who can’t afford to live in the community I serve”.]

I understand zoning reform is locally contested. I’m asking you to engage with it on the substantive merits rather than allowing local opposition to block what the empirical record now strongly supports.

I’d appreciate knowing your position on specific bills in [state legislature] and on the broader question of state-level zoning preemption.

Thank you for your service.

Sincerely,

[Your name] [Your address]

← All letters