Skip to content
Americans for Propriety
Menu

Letter template · Local Official

To a city council member or county supervisor: support just-cause eviction and right to counsel

The two most consequential tenant protections — and both are typically state-or-local-level fights.

Updated April 4, 2025 · Issue: housing

Personalize with a specific local concern: a building where tenants have been pressured to leave, a neighbor’s eviction, a rent increase your community has experienced. Local officials read constituent mail more carefully than most levels of government, and specific local examples carry weight.


Dear [Council Member / Supervisor / Commissioner] [Last Name],

I’m writing as a resident of [city/town/county] to ask you to support local just-cause eviction protections and right to counsel in eviction proceedings.

US tenant law is unusually weak by comparison with most peer countries. Most US tenants have no just-cause protection — landlords can decline to renew leases for any reason or no reason. Most US tenants face eviction proceedings without legal representation while landlords have counsel. The cumulative effect is a high-churn rental market in which most tenants live one rent increase or non-renewal away from displacement.

Two local-level reforms address this directly:

Just-cause eviction. Requires landlords to identify a specific cause for non-renewal — nonpayment, lease violation, owner move-in, etc. — rather than declining to renew at will. Implemented in many US cities and several states, it shifts power back toward tenants without raising the supply-side concerns that broader rent-control measures sometimes do.

Right to counsel in eviction proceedings. Public legal representation for tenants in eviction cases. NYC, San Francisco, Cleveland, Newark, Philadelphia, and a growing list of cities have implemented some form of right to counsel. The empirical record is strong: representation measurably reduces eviction rates and produces better outcomes for tenants — especially those with valid defenses or counterclaims that go undeveloped without legal support.

Both reforms have:

  1. Strong empirical records of measurable effectiveness.
  2. Bipartisan support in many implementations.
  3. Costs that have been substantially offset by the reduced public costs of housing instability and homelessness.
  4. Clear local-government implementation paths that don’t require state or federal action.

[Personalize: name a specific local concern. Examples: “Our [neighborhood/building] has seen [specific pattern]”; “A neighbor / friend / family member faced [specific eviction or non-renewal]”; “Local rent increases have run [specific data] over the past [period]”; “I’m a [tenant/landlord/social worker/legal aid attorney] with direct experience”.]

I’d appreciate knowing your position on specific local proposals on these reforms and on the broader local agenda for tenant protection. If [city/county] doesn’t currently have a proposal on the table, I’d encourage you to introduce or co-sponsor one.

Thank you for your service to our community.

Sincerely,

[Your name] [Your address]

← All letters